3D is officially dying

As you may not know I don't like 3D and here is why in very basic bullet points.

1. It gives me a really bad headache and I mean a really bad headache
2. You have to sit in a certain point of the room or the theater for it to work well. If you sit at the side of the theater you are fucked.
3. and this this is the main one and I better use bold in case movie makers or execs are reading this...It's adds fuck all to the film!!!!!!!!



So there you have as simple as possible but back to the original point...It's officially dying

                                                            Even Churchill is celebrating on 3D losing


I say it's dying because Warner Bros have just given 3D it's biggest blow to the technology. They were going to release the next Harry Potter film in 3D but will now only be releasing it in 2D in the cinemas.

Now this may not mean much to some peoples mind but belive me...It's a big blow for 3D. Warner Bros for starters decided the digital war between HD-DVD and Blu-Ray by choosing to give up on HD-DVD and release their High Definition films solely on Blu-Ray...Well Sony did pay them mind.
But if you have a big studio which houses Batman, Superman and Harry Potter etc saying no to 3D. You just know that Hollywood has lost faith in 3D and is indeed just a phase, which is what I have been saying right from the start.
Not only that but the writing is pretty much on the wall with only two percent of Britons want a 3DTV and about sixty seven percent of the Japanese not waning it with about thirty percent thinking about getting one.

But I'm sure the studios made their decision on this information via FT.com
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0e709eee-a892-11df-86dd-00144feabdc0.html

"It was hailed as the great saviour of the film industry, but since 3D technology propelled Avatar to a record-breaking $2.73bn box-office haul, fears are growing that Hollywood is endangering its profitable new format.

Several 3D films have topped the box office charts this year, including Alice in Wonderland and Clash of the Titans. Yet, a string of recent 3D films has stumbled at the box office, notably Cats & Dogs: The Revenge of Kitty Galore, which flopped, and Step Up 3D, which made less than the first two films in the dance series, both of which were released in 2D."

I think 3D was used to hide something which they should be doing when making a film, again from the same site

"“The studios are guilty of short-term thinking,” says Brandon Gray, president of Box Office Mojo, which tracks film box-office performance. “They all jumped on the 3D bandwagon but they’re avoiding the real issue, which is their bankruptcy regarding storytelling.”"

Thats the real reason they converted some films as 3D to hide the fact the film was rubbish and using 3D as a device to sell films that they knew sucked, cost nothing to make with little effort from them required.
So instead of working on a script, idea etc which can take time and money to do, they use (used now really as 3D doesn't work anymore financially) 3D as a way to make money by doing little to no effort...A guaranteed way of making money so they thought.

Some people say technology improves films bla bla but I beg to differ.I mean just look at the films in the seventies and eighties where they didn't have digital effects to work with, The Godfather, Chinatown, Star Wars, Superman, Blade Runner, The Thing and Indiana Jones. What made those films great was hard work and clearly heart...Thats what studios should look for in films to make money...Not some silly gimmick like 3D and treat film audiences like idiots. But luckily and to finish on a more positive note, we have people working today in films who show the "rules" .("Shia Leboef has to be in it as coincidently he's in financially successful films at the moment" bla bla) to the studios are just daft.

                                                Yeah stuff you silly ill thought out rules!!!!!!!!